Comments on: I love HAML http://www.webdevbros.net/2008/04/26/i-love-haml/ hot talk about web scripting Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:59:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Michal http://www.webdevbros.net/2008/04/26/i-love-haml/#comment-7861 Michal Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:02:09 +0000 http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=175#comment-7861 why arent you writing your webapps with a true c++ webframework like “Wt”: http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/ ;) :)))) i dont really care .. i was just wondering. i prefer nice & readable code over performance ... why arent you writing your webapps with a true c++ webframework like “Wt”: http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/ ;)

:)))) i dont really care .. i was just wondering. i prefer nice & readable code over performance …

]]> By: Nathan Weizenbaum http://www.webdevbros.net/2008/04/26/i-love-haml/#comment-7860 Nathan Weizenbaum Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:44:52 +0000 http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=175#comment-7860 fab: The recommended way of dealing with long Ruby statements in a Haml template is to move the statement into a helper method. This tends to make your views much clearer and can help facilitate abstraction. Michal: Haml's roughly on par with ERB as of the most recent release. The parsing is constant time; the file is parsed once and compiled to a Ruby method, which is run with each successive rendering. Also, it's mightily confusing to have the most recent comments on the top. fab: The recommended way of dealing with long Ruby statements in a Haml template is to move the statement into a helper method. This tends to make your views much clearer and can help facilitate abstraction.

Michal: Haml’s roughly on par with ERB as of the most recent release. The parsing is constant time; the file is parsed once and compiled to a Ruby method, which is run with each successive rendering.

Also, it’s mightily confusing to have the most recent comments on the top.

]]> By: fab http://www.webdevbros.net/2008/04/26/i-love-haml/#comment-7859 fab Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:21:59 +0000 http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=175#comment-7859 afaik it has the same overhead as every erb template has. it's not a real difference i guess. and after all speed in view templates doesn't matter that much i think. the db is the major bottleneck in webapps nowadays. but i do enjoy the lesser code i have to write. and if you are for real performance: why arent you writing your webapps with a true c++ webframework like "Wt": http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/ ;) afaik it has the same overhead as every erb template has. it’s not a real difference i guess. and after all speed in view templates doesn’t matter that much i think. the db is the major bottleneck in webapps nowadays. but i do enjoy the lesser code i have to write. and if you are for real performance: why arent you writing your webapps with a true c++ webframework like “Wt”: http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/ ;)

]]> By: Michal http://www.webdevbros.net/2008/04/26/i-love-haml/#comment-7858 Michal Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:14:09 +0000 http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=175#comment-7858 sound very good .. but what about the speed? i am wondering if the extra parsing lacks a bit? sound very good .. but what about the speed? i am wondering if the extra parsing lacks a bit?

]]>