<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Service vs. Component</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdevbros.net/2009/07/14/service-vs-component/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdevbros.net/2009/07/14/service-vs-component/</link>
	<description>hot talk about web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 13:11:20 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopalakrishna Palem</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevbros.net/2009/07/14/service-vs-component/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopalakrishna Palem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=374#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>Typically these below differences are also helpful:

Components are self-contained and autonomous with &quot;stateful&quot; information (which is required for implementing persistence).

On the otherhand, Services are mostly &#039;stateless&#039; (and inherently use components to achieve their intended functionality). Persistence is not something that is directly related to Services.

Also, the main difference between Component-oriented and Service-Oriented approach is the &#039;ownership&#039;. You, the user, own the Component - on the contrary, you do not own the Service, you just &#039;use&#039; the Service (and pay per service).

Gopalakrishna Palem
Creator of CFugue C++ Runtime
http://gpalem.web.officelive.com/CFugue.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically these below differences are also helpful:</p>
<p>Components are self-contained and autonomous with &#8220;stateful&#8221; information (which is required for implementing persistence).</p>
<p>On the otherhand, Services are mostly &#8216;stateless&#8217; (and inherently use components to achieve their intended functionality). Persistence is not something that is directly related to Services.</p>
<p>Also, the main difference between Component-oriented and Service-Oriented approach is the &#8216;ownership&#8217;. You, the user, own the Component &#8211; on the contrary, you do not own the Service, you just &#8216;use&#8217; the Service (and pay per service).</p>
<p>Gopalakrishna Palem<br />
Creator of CFugue C++ Runtime<br />
<a href="http://gpalem.web.officelive.com/CFugue.html" rel="nofollow">http://gpalem.web.officelive.com/CFugue.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.webdevbros.net/2009/07/14/service-vs-component/#comment-10837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdevbros.net/?p=374#comment-10837</guid>
		<description>HEy, i had the same troubles. This definition really comes in handy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEy, i had the same troubles. This definition really comes in handy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

